with you 국내
다른 곳에서 찾기
네이버사전 다음사전 Cambridge M-W M-W Thesaurus OneLook Google
Sometimes it may take a lifetime to make the world around you change.
When you are young, it is easy to feel impatient and frustrated with the
delays and seemingly stupid hitches that take place. However, if you are
aware of local and global issues when you are young, your devotion to
making the world a better place will continue. And who knows what you
might achieve in fifty years?
때론 주변 세상을 변화시키는 데 평생이 걸릴 수도 있다. 젊을 때는, 지체와
발생하는 웃겨 보이는 장애로 조급해하고 낙심하기 쉽다. 그러나 젊을 때
국내외 문제를 인식하면, 세상을 더 좋은 곳으로 만들려는 당신의 헌신은
계속될 것이다. 그리고 50년 후에 당신이 무엇을 성취할지 누가 알겠는가?
* hitch : a slight problem or difficulty
국내·외 AI 유행지역에서 닭, 오리 등의 가금류와 접촉 후 발열, 기침, 인후통 등 호흡기 증상이 발생하면 즉시 관할지역 보건소 또는 질병관리본부 콜센터로 신고하시기 바랍니다.
If you experience respiratory symptoms such as fever, cough, and sore throat after contact with poultry such as chickens and ducks in domestic or foreign AI epidemic areas, please immediately report it to the local community health center or KDCA Call Center.
The time limits for an allegation of sales at prices below the cost of production made by
the petitioner or other domestic interested party are generally 1) on a country-wide basis,
20 days after the date on which the initial questionnaire was sent to the respondents; and
2) on a company-specific basis, 20 days after a respondent files the response to the
relevant section of the questionnaire (i.e. section B). In some cases, these dates can be
extended. If you receive a request for extension, you should discuss it with your
supervisor or PM (see 19 CFR 351.301(2)(i)).
일반적으로 제소자나 다른 국내이해관계인이 원가이하판매를 주장할
수 있는 시기는 (1)국가전반을 대상으로 할 경우는 피제소자에게 최초
질문서가 발송된 날부터 20일까지 (2)특정회사를 대상으로 할 경우는
피제소자가 답변서를 제출한 날부터 20일 이내이다. 경우에 따라 이 시한
은 연장될 수 있다. 기간연장 요청이 있으면 감독관이나 프로그램 관리자
와 협의해야 한다.
At this time, we are following the deadline for filing a company-specific, sales at less
than COP allegation for the filing of a multinational corporation allegation, which is 20
days after a respondent files its response to the relevant sections of the antidumping
questionnaire. For the most recent DOC positions on the acceptance of MNC
allegations, see Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Color
Negative Photographic Paper and Chemical Components Thereof from the Netherlands,
59 FR 16181 (April 6, 1994), and Initiation of Antidumping Investigations: Melamine
Institutional Dinnerware Products from Indonesia, the People's Republic of China, and
Taiwan, 61 FR 8039 (March 1, 1996). Note that the first two cases cited used the old
home market viability test (where home market sales had to meet the 5- percent of third-
country sales standard). Always consult with your supervisor or PM if you are involved
in an MNC allegation analysis.
이 단계에서 다국적기업이라는 특별상황의 주장을 제기할 수 있는 시
한은 특정기업의 원가이하판매의 주장을 제기할 수 있는 시한과 같은데,
이는 피제소자가 반덤핑 질문서에 대한 답변을 제출한 후 20일 이내이다.
최근의 다국적기업 주장을 상무부가 받아들인 사건으로는 네덜란드산
Color Negative Photographic Paper 의 예비판정(59 FR 16181, 94.4.6)과
인도네시아, 중국, 타이완산 Melamine Institutional Dinnerware Product
의 조사개시 결정(61 FR 8049, 96.3.1.)이 있다. 위에서 인용한 2가지
사건은 과거의 국내시장 활력성 검사(국내시장 판매가 제3국시장 판매의
5% 기준)를 활용하였다. 다국적기업에 관한 주장이 제기되면 감독관이나
프로그램관리자와 협의한다.
ANTIDUMPING INVESTIGATIONS INITIATION CHECKLIST
-
SUBJECT: (insert case name)
-
CASE NUMBER: (insert case number)
-
PETITIONER(S):
(insert name(s) - provide the locations of each plant and headquarters)
-
COUNSEL:
(insert name of law firm)
-
RESPONDENT(S):
(insert name(s))
-
SCOPE:
(insert the scope of the investigation)
-
IMPORT STATISTICS:
(insert the volume and value of imports for the most recently completed calendar year,
year-to-date, and the corresponding prior period)
-
CASE CALENDAR:
Petition Filed:
Initiation Deadline:
ITC Preliminary Determination:
ITA Preliminary Determination:
ITA Final Determination:
ITC Final Determination:
Order:
-
INDUSTRY SUPPORT: Does the petitioner(s) account for more than 50% of production
of the domestic like product?
Yes (insert %) (petition page reference)
No (insert %)
-
If No, do those expressing support account for the majority of those expressing an
opinion and at least 25% of domestic production?
Yes
No - do not initiate
-
Describe how industry support was established - specifically, describe the nature of any
polling or other step undertaken to determine the level of domestic industry support.
-
Was there opposition to the petition?
Yes
(identify each party expressing opposition)
No
-
Are any of the parties who have expressed opposition to the petition either importers or
domestic producers affiliated with foreign producers?
Yes
No
(explain how the views of these parties were treated in your determination of industry
support)
-
INJURY ALLEGATION:
-
We have received a copy of the action request from the Director of the Office of
Investigations, International Trade Commission. It indicates that the ITC finds that the
petition contains adequate and accurate information with respect to material injury. (The
relevant injury data can be found on page (insert #) of the petition.)
-
Does the petition contain evidence of causation? (answer Yes or No) (See page (insert #)
of the petition.) Specifically, does the petition contain information relative to:
-
___ volume and value of imports (see page (insert #) of the petition)
-
___ U.S. market share (i.e., the ratio of imports to consumption) (see page (insert #)
of the petition)
-
___ actual pricing (i.e., evidence of decreased pricing) (see page (insert #) of the
petition)
-
___ relative pricing (i.e., evidence of imports underselling U.S. products) (see page
(insert #) of the petition)
-
PETITION REQUIREMENTS:
-
Does the petition contain the following:
the name and address of the petitioner
the names and addresses of all known domestic producers of the domestic like
product
the volume and value of the domestic like product produced by the petitioner
and each domestic producer identified for the most recently completed 12-month period for which data is available
-
Was the entire domestic industry identified in the petition?
Yes
No (% of producers identified)
-
Does the petition also contain the following:
a clear and detailed description of the merchandise to be investigated, including
the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers.
the name of each country in which the merchandise originates or from which
the merchandise is exported.
Was the petition filed simultaneously with the Department of Commerce and
the ITC?
Yes
No
an adequate summary of the proprietary data was provided.
a statement regarding release under administrative protective order.
a certification of the facts contained in the petition by an official of the
petitioning firm(s) and its legal representative (if applicable).
import volume and value information for the most recent two-year period.
-
LESS THAN FAIR VALUE ALLEGATION:
-
Export Price/Constructed Export Price
-
Provide an explanation on how the export price and/or constructed export price was
derived (include in your description the source of the pricing information and any
adjustments necessary to calculate an ex-factory price; reference the pages in the petition
that contain this information; if the information is based on a market research report or
affidavit, explain why you believe that these sources are appropriate).
-
Does the petition contain the following:
support documentation for the alleged prices or costs and claimed adjustments.
any market research reports including an affidavits referring to sources and
how information was obtained
current and dated price data (no more than one-year old).
price and cost data from contemporaneous time periods.
correct currency rates used for all conversions to U.S. dollars (i.e., Federal
Reserve Bank of New York).
conversion factors for comparisons of differing units of measure.
-
Normal value
-
Provide an explanation on how the export price was derived (include in your description
the source of the pricing information and any adjustments necessary to calculate an ex-factory price; reference the pages in the pe
tition that contain this information; if the
information is based on a market research report or affidavit, explain why you believe that
these sources are appropriate).
-
Does the petition contain the following:
support documentation for the alleged prices or costs and claimed adjustments.
any market research reports including an affidavits referring to sources and
how information was obtained.
current and dated price data (no more than one year old).
price and cost data from contemporaneous time periods.
correct currency rates used for all conversions to U.S. dollars (i.e., Federal
Reserve Bank of New York).
conversion factors for comparisons of differing units of measure.
-
ESTIMATED MARGINS:
(insert the range of estimated dumping margins)
-
OTHER ISSUES:
(e.g., COP allegation, regional industry, critical circumstances)
-
RECOMMENDATION:
-
Based on sources readily available to the Department, we have examined the accuracy
and adequacy of the evidence provided in the petition, and recommend determining that
the evidence is sufficient to justify the initiation of an antidumping investigation. We
also recommend determining that the petition has been filed by or on behalf of the
domestic industry.
-
반덤핑조사개시 체크리스트
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
제목 : (사건명 기입)
사건 번호 : (사건번호 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
제소자 :
(이름 기입 - 본사 및 공장의 위치 기입)
-
고문변호사 :
(법률회사 이름 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(피제소자)
(이름 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
범위 :
(조사범위 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
수입통계 : (최근 1년의 수입량과 수입액 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------
조사일정 :
신청일자
조사개시 최종일자
국제무역위원회의 예비판정
국제무역행정처의 예비판정
국제무역행정처의 최종판정
국제무역위원회의 최종판정
관세부과명령
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-
업계의 찬성 : 제소자는 국내동종물품 생산의 50% 이상을 점유하는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
아니오 ( % 기입)
-
만약 아니라면 찬성을 표하는 기업이 의견제시 기업중 다수이고 국내
생산의 최소한 25%를 점유하는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
아니오 - 조사개시 불가
-
어떻게 업계의 찬성이 이루어졌는지를 기술한다. - 특히 국내산업의
지지수준을 판단하기 위하여 수행된 여론조사나 기타 조치내용을 기술
한다.
-
신청에 반대가 있었는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
(반대를 표시한 각각의 관계인 명시)
아니오
-
신청에 반대한 자중 해외생산자와 연계된 수입업자나 국내생산자가 있는가?
예
아니오
(이들 당사자의 의견이 업계의 찬성여부를 판단할 때에 어떻게 반영되었
는지 설명한다)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
피해주장 :
국제무역위원회 조사국장으로부터 조치요청서 사본을 받는데, 이는 국제
무역위원회가 신청서에서 실질적인 피해와 관련하여 적절하고 정확한 자
료가 포함되어 있다는 것을 발견하였다는 것을 표시하는 것이다.
(관련되는 피해자료는 신청서의 해당페이지(페이지 수 기입)에서 볼 수
있다)
신청서에 인과관계의 근거가 포함되어 있는가?(예 또는 아니오 대답)
(신청서의 해당페이지 참조), 특히 다음과 관련한 자료를 포함하고 있는가?
수입량 및 수입금액
미국내 시장 점유율 (즉 소비에 대한 수입의 비율)
실제가격 (즉 가격인하의 증거)
상대가격 (미국상품의 판매를 위축시킨 수입의 증거)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
신청서의 구비사항
-
신청서에는 다음사항을 포함하고 있는가 :
검색결과는 5 건이고 총 275 라인의 자료가 출력되었습니다. 맨위로
(화면 어디서나 Alt+Z : 단어 재입력.)
(내용 중 검색하고 싶은 단어가 있으면 그 단어를 더블클릭하세요.)
