영어학습사전 Home
   

legal counsel

다른 곳에서 찾기  네이버사전 다음사전 Cambridge M-W M-W Thesaurus OneLook Google

I came home
제가 집에 왔는데
and Tyler, had, hadn't put Zachary to bed because he was crying
잭이 울고 있어서 타일러가 잭을 재우지 못했더군요
and I, and I wanted to hush him up and I just went to far.
애를 달래려고 했었는데 도가 지나쳤었나 봐요
For the record, my client made this statement against legal counsel.
공식적으로는 제 고객이 법적 변호인에 반해서 진술한 겁니다
Would you tell us how you killed him?
어떻게 죽였는지 말씀해 주시겠습니까?
I smothered him with a pot holder
오븐 장갑으로 질식시켰어요
and that's when Steve and I came up with the kidnap story.
그리고 남편과 제가 유괴 사건을 꾸몄던거죠
It was the longest night of our lives.
우리 생에 제일 긴 밤이었습니다
You had to wait till morning to report him missing.
아침까지 실종 신고를 미뤘어야 했겠군요
So that it wouldn't look suspicious.
그래야 수상쩍어 보이지 않으니까요

제주항공은 인수를 위해 내부적으로 꾸린 태스크포스팀(TFT)이 이스타항공의 실물 데이터룸을 살펴보고 있으며 법률자문사 광장과 논의를 진행 중인 것으로 알려졌다.
Jeju Air is reportedly looking at Eastar Jet's real data room by the task force team (TFT) internally set up for the acquisition and is in talks with the legal counsel square.

Francis Gurry, chief legal counsel and WIPO assistant director general,
told Reuters: ``We expect a decision rapidly. It is done on the basis of
documents only, without a hearing.
``But if there is a significant volume of cases, we will gather the panel
members together to review them in batches.
``If some indications prove correct, there could be significant demand at
least initially,'' added Gurry, an Australian. ``Then there will be a
deterrent effect of the procedure which would discourage people from
cyber-squatting.''
WIPO의 프란시스 거리(Francis Gurry) 수석 법률자문관이자 사무차장은
"결정이 빨리 내려질 것"이라며 "이는 청문절차 없이 서류에 의해서만
내려지며 조정건수가 많을 경우에는 패널구성원 전체가 참여해 한꺼번에
심사한다고 밝혔다. 그는 "신청인의 어떤 주장들이 타당한 지 가려지면 상대방은
여기에 해명해야하는 등 상당한 부담을 안게 된다"며 "이 때문에 조정절차가
사이버스쿼팅을 억제하는 효과를 갖는다"고 설명했다.

Four other units in IA play an important role during the investigative phase of the
AD and CVD process: 1) the Office of Policy formulates and disseminates
policies which govern the administration of the AD and CVD laws, 2) the Office
of the Chief Counsel for IA (a unit of the General Counsel's Office rather than
ITA) provides comprehensive legal support and advice; 3) the IA Office of
Accounting analyzes and verifies cost information and works closely with case
analysts in the actual calculation of dumping margins and net subsidies; and 4) the
IA Central Records Unit maintains all official and public reading files, receives
and distributes all case-related computer tapes and written filings, and assists in
the preparation of court records. An organizational chart of IA, and an IA phone
directory may be found on ITA's internal computer network.
반덤핑 및 상계관세의 조사과정에서 수입행정실내 4개 부서가 중요한 역할
을 하고 있다. 1) 정책담당관실(Office of Policy)은 반덤핑 및 상계관세
관련법규에 대한 정책을 수립하고 배포하며 2) 수입행정실전담 수석자문
담당관실(Office of the Chief Counsel for IA)은 종합적인 법률지원과
자문을 제공하며, 이는 국제무역행정처보다는 오히려 자문관(General
Counsel)실의 조직이라 할 수 있다. 3) 수입행정실의 회계담당관실(IA
Office of Accounting)은 가격정보를 분석하고, 검증하며 덤핑마진과 순
보조금의 실제 계산에서 조사담당관과 긴밀하게 의논하고 4) 수입행정실
중앙기록관리반(IA Central Records Unit)은 모든 공식·공개열람자료를
유지하고 모든 사건관련 컴퓨터 테이프와 서면의견을 접수, 배포하며
법원기록의 준비를 지원한다. 수입행정실의 조직표, 전화안내는 국제무역
행정처의 내부 컴퓨터 네트워크에서 찾아볼 수 있다.

Certification of Accuracy
-
Any person that submits factual information to the Department must include with the submission
a certification of the completeness and accuracy of the factual information. Certifications must
be made by a knowledgeable official responsible for presentation of the factual information and
by the party's legal counsel or other representative, if any. A sample certification form is
included as Appendix V to the questionnaire. (Section 782 (b) of the Act and section 351.303 (g)
of the regulations).
-
정확성의 증명(Certification of Accuracy)
-
상무부에 사실정보자료를 제출할 때에는 그 정보의 완전성과 정확성에 대
한 증명을 함께 제출하여야 한다. 증명은 사실정보제공을 담당하고 있는
공무원이나 이해관계인의 법률고문 또는 대리인에 의한 것이어야 한다.
증명양식에 대한 예가 질문서 부록5에 제시되어 있다.(법 제782조(b)와
규칙(19 CFR) 351.303(g) 참조)

ANTIDUMPING INVESTIGATIONS INITIATION CHECKLIST
-
SUBJECT: (insert case name)
-
CASE NUMBER: (insert case number)
-
PETITIONER(S):
(insert name(s) - provide the locations of each plant and headquarters)
-
COUNSEL:
(insert name of law firm)
-
RESPONDENT(S):
(insert name(s))
-
SCOPE:
(insert the scope of the investigation)
-
IMPORT STATISTICS:
(insert the volume and value of imports for the most recently completed calendar year,
year-to-date, and the corresponding prior period)
-
CASE CALENDAR:
Petition Filed:
Initiation Deadline:
ITC Preliminary Determination:
ITA Preliminary Determination:
ITA Final Determination:
ITC Final Determination:
Order:
-
INDUSTRY SUPPORT: Does the petitioner(s) account for more than 50% of production
of the domestic like product?
Yes (insert %) (petition page reference)
No (insert %)
-
If No, do those expressing support account for the majority of those expressing an
opinion and at least 25% of domestic production?
Yes
No - do not initiate
-
Describe how industry support was established - specifically, describe the nature of any
polling or other step undertaken to determine the level of domestic industry support.
-
Was there opposition to the petition?
Yes
(identify each party expressing opposition)
No
-
Are any of the parties who have expressed opposition to the petition either importers or
domestic producers affiliated with foreign producers?
Yes
No
(explain how the views of these parties were treated in your determination of industry
support)
-
INJURY ALLEGATION:
-
We have received a copy of the action request from the Director of the Office of
Investigations, International Trade Commission. It indicates that the ITC finds that the
petition contains adequate and accurate information with respect to material injury. (The
relevant injury data can be found on page (insert #) of the petition.)
-
Does the petition contain evidence of causation? (answer Yes or No) (See page (insert #)
of the petition.) Specifically, does the petition contain information relative to:
-
___ volume and value of imports (see page (insert #) of the petition)
-
___ U.S. market share (i.e., the ratio of imports to consumption) (see page (insert #)
of the petition)
-
___ actual pricing (i.e., evidence of decreased pricing) (see page (insert #) of the
petition)
-
___ relative pricing (i.e., evidence of imports underselling U.S. products) (see page
(insert #) of the petition)
-
PETITION REQUIREMENTS:
-
Does the petition contain the following:
the name and address of the petitioner
the names and addresses of all known domestic producers of the domestic like
product
the volume and value of the domestic like product produced by the petitioner
and each domestic producer identified for the most recently completed 12-month period for which data is available
-
Was the entire domestic industry identified in the petition?
Yes
No (% of producers identified)
-
Does the petition also contain the following:
a clear and detailed description of the merchandise to be investigated, including
the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers.
the name of each country in which the merchandise originates or from which
the merchandise is exported.
Was the petition filed simultaneously with the Department of Commerce and
the ITC?
Yes
No
an adequate summary of the proprietary data was provided.
a statement regarding release under administrative protective order.
a certification of the facts contained in the petition by an official of the
petitioning firm(s) and its legal representative (if applicable).
import volume and value information for the most recent two-year period.
-
LESS THAN FAIR VALUE ALLEGATION:
-
Export Price/Constructed Export Price
-
Provide an explanation on how the export price and/or constructed export price was
derived (include in your description the source of the pricing information and any
adjustments necessary to calculate an ex-factory price; reference the pages in the petition
that contain this information; if the information is based on a market research report or
affidavit, explain why you believe that these sources are appropriate).
-
Does the petition contain the following:
support documentation for the alleged prices or costs and claimed adjustments.
any market research reports including an affidavits referring to sources and
how information was obtained
current and dated price data (no more than one-year old).
price and cost data from contemporaneous time periods.
correct currency rates used for all conversions to U.S. dollars (i.e., Federal
Reserve Bank of New York).
conversion factors for comparisons of differing units of measure.
-
Normal value
-
Provide an explanation on how the export price was derived (include in your description
the source of the pricing information and any adjustments necessary to calculate an ex-factory price; reference the pages in the pe
tition that contain this information; if the
information is based on a market research report or affidavit, explain why you believe that
these sources are appropriate).
-
Does the petition contain the following:
support documentation for the alleged prices or costs and claimed adjustments.
any market research reports including an affidavits referring to sources and
how information was obtained.
current and dated price data (no more than one year old).
price and cost data from contemporaneous time periods.
correct currency rates used for all conversions to U.S. dollars (i.e., Federal
Reserve Bank of New York).
conversion factors for comparisons of differing units of measure.
-
ESTIMATED MARGINS:
(insert the range of estimated dumping margins)
-
OTHER ISSUES:
(e.g., COP allegation, regional industry, critical circumstances)
-
RECOMMENDATION:
-
Based on sources readily available to the Department, we have examined the accuracy
and adequacy of the evidence provided in the petition, and recommend determining that
the evidence is sufficient to justify the initiation of an antidumping investigation. We
also recommend determining that the petition has been filed by or on behalf of the
domestic industry.
-
반덤핑조사개시 체크리스트
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
제목 : (사건명 기입)
사건 번호 : (사건번호 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
제소자 :
(이름 기입 - 본사 및 공장의 위치 기입)
-
고문변호사 :
(법률회사 이름 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(피제소자)
(이름 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
범위 :
(조사범위 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
수입통계 : (최근 1년의 수입량과 수입액 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------
조사일정 :
신청일자
조사개시 최종일자
국제무역위원회의 예비판정
국제무역행정처의 예비판정
국제무역행정처의 최종판정
국제무역위원회의 최종판정
관세부과명령
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-
업계의 찬성 : 제소자는 국내동종물품 생산의 50% 이상을 점유하는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
아니오 ( % 기입)
-
만약 아니라면 찬성을 표하는 기업이 의견제시 기업중 다수이고 국내
생산의 최소한 25%를 점유하는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
아니오 - 조사개시 불가
-
어떻게 업계의 찬성이 이루어졌는지를 기술한다. - 특히 국내산업의
지지수준을 판단하기 위하여 수행된 여론조사나 기타 조치내용을 기술
한다.
-
신청에 반대가 있었는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
(반대를 표시한 각각의 관계인 명시)
아니오
-
신청에 반대한 자중 해외생산자와 연계된 수입업자나 국내생산자가 있는가?
예
아니오
(이들 당사자의 의견이 업계의 찬성여부를 판단할 때에 어떻게 반영되었
는지 설명한다)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
피해주장 :
국제무역위원회 조사국장으로부터 조치요청서 사본을 받는데, 이는 국제
무역위원회가 신청서에서 실질적인 피해와 관련하여 적절하고 정확한 자
료가 포함되어 있다는 것을 발견하였다는 것을 표시하는 것이다.
(관련되는 피해자료는 신청서의 해당페이지(페이지 수 기입)에서 볼 수
있다)
신청서에 인과관계의 근거가 포함되어 있는가?(예 또는 아니오 대답)
(신청서의 해당페이지 참조), 특히 다음과 관련한 자료를 포함하고 있는가?
수입량 및 수입금액
미국내 시장 점유율 (즉 소비에 대한 수입의 비율)
실제가격 (즉 가격인하의 증거)
상대가격 (미국상품의 판매를 위축시킨 수입의 증거)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
신청서의 구비사항
-
신청서에는 다음사항을 포함하고 있는가 :


검색결과는 6 건이고 총 303 라인의 자료가 출력되었습니다.    맨위로
(화면 어디서나 Alt+Z : 단어 재입력.)
(내용 중 검색하고 싶은 단어가 있으면 그 단어를 더블클릭하세요.)