영어학습사전 Home
   

contemporaneous

다른 곳에서 찾기  네이버사전 다음사전 Cambridge M-W M-W Thesaurus OneLook Google

contemporaneous 〔ｋ∂ｎｔ｀ｅｍｐ∂ｒ´ｅｉｎｉ∂ｓ〕 동시 존재(발생)의, 동시성의, (..와)동시대의, ~ly, ~ness

[比較] synchronous, simultaneous, coincident
synchronous는 같은 속도로 똑같이 진행하는 것, 거듭 일어나는 것 또는 일반적으로 짧은 동안의 일치를 가리킨다.
two pendulums so adjusted that their movements are synchronous/ The timers in the gun turrets and in fire control room were synchronous.
simultaneous는 동시에, 동시점에 작용하는 것을 말한다.
The two shots were simultaneous.
coincident는 무슨 일이 동시에 일어나는 것, 때로는 현저하게 또는 공교롭게 때가 일치하는 것을 나타낸다.
His sudden departure was suspiciously coincident with the stranger''s arrival.
contemporary, contemporaneous는 동시에 존재하는 것을 의미하지만, 위의 세 말과 다른 것은 나타내는 때가 명확하지 않아서(indefinite), 사람의 경우에는 일생, 사건의 경우에는 한 시대를 가리키는 수도 있다.

[百] 동시이상 (同時異相) contemporaneous heterotopic faces

contemporaneous 같은 시대의

Contemporaneous Sales
-
In investigations, the Department normally compares average export prices (or constructed
export prices) to average normal values. The averages normally are based on sales made over the
course of the period of investigation. In administrative reviews of existing antidumping orders,
on the other hand, the Department normally compares the export price (or constructed export
price) of an individual U.S. sale to an average normal value for a "contemporaneous month."
-
The preferred month is the month in which the particular U.S. sale was made. If, during the
preferred month, there are no sales in the comparison market of a foreign like product that is
identical to the subject merchandise, the Department will then employ a six-month window for
the selection of contemporaneous sales. For each U.S. sale, the Department will calculate an
average price for sales of identical merchandise in the most recent of the three months prior to
the month of the U.S. sale. If there are no such sales, the Department will use sales of identical
merchandise in the earlier of the two months following the month of the U.S. sale. If there are no
sales of identical merchandise in any of these months, the Department will apply the same
progression to sales of similar merchandise.
-
동일한 시기의 판매(Contemporaneous Sales)
-
상무부는 반덤핑조사시 대개 평균수출가격(또는 구성수출가격)과 평균
정상가격을 비교한다. 평균가격은 대개 조사대상기간의 판매실적을 기초
로 한다. 그러나 행정재심의 경우에는 상무부는 대개 개별적인 미국수출
가격(또는 구성수출가격)과 "동일한 시기의 월"의 평균정상가격을 비교한
다. 이때 특정 미국수출이 일어난 바로 그 달을 "동일한 시기의 월"로
사용하는 것이 보통이다. 만일 그 달에 조사대상물품에 대한 동종물품의
판매가 비교시장에서 일어나지 않았을 경우에는 상무부는 동일한 시기의
판매실적을 정하기 위해 6개월 동안의 판매실적을 검토한다. 각각의
미국수출에 대해 미국 수출월 이전의 최근 3개월 동안의 동일물품의
평균판매가격을 계산한다. 그 기간에도 판매실적이 없을 때에는 상무부
는 미국수출월의 다음 2개월 동안의 동일물품의 평균판매가격을 계산한다.
만일 이 기간에도 동일물품의 판매실적이 없을 경우에는 상무부는 유사
물품에 대한 판매에 대해서 위의 방법을 적용하게 된다.

Prices used as the bases for normal value (NV) and export price (EP) and constructed
export price (CEP) should reflect contemporaneous periods of time.
Currency-conversion rates used should be included and the source of these rates
should be given. See the antidumping (AD) initiation checklist in section VII of
this chapter for a complete listing of all areas that need to be analyzed.
정상가격(NV), 수출가격(EV), 구성수출가격(CEV)에는 같은 가격이 사용되어야 하며,
사용된 환율 및 근거자료가 명시되어야 한다.
분석되어야 할 부분에 대해서는 이 장 제7절의 반덤핑 조사개시를 위한
체크리스트를 참고하라.

ANTIDUMPING INVESTIGATIONS INITIATION CHECKLIST
-
SUBJECT: (insert case name)
-
CASE NUMBER: (insert case number)
-
PETITIONER(S):
(insert name(s) - provide the locations of each plant and headquarters)
-
COUNSEL:
(insert name of law firm)
-
RESPONDENT(S):
(insert name(s))
-
SCOPE:
(insert the scope of the investigation)
-
IMPORT STATISTICS:
(insert the volume and value of imports for the most recently completed calendar year,
year-to-date, and the corresponding prior period)
-
CASE CALENDAR:
Petition Filed:
Initiation Deadline:
ITC Preliminary Determination:
ITA Preliminary Determination:
ITA Final Determination:
ITC Final Determination:
Order:
-
INDUSTRY SUPPORT: Does the petitioner(s) account for more than 50% of production
of the domestic like product?
Yes (insert %) (petition page reference)
No (insert %)
-
If No, do those expressing support account for the majority of those expressing an
opinion and at least 25% of domestic production?
Yes
No - do not initiate
-
Describe how industry support was established - specifically, describe the nature of any
polling or other step undertaken to determine the level of domestic industry support.
-
Was there opposition to the petition?
Yes
(identify each party expressing opposition)
No
-
Are any of the parties who have expressed opposition to the petition either importers or
domestic producers affiliated with foreign producers?
Yes
No
(explain how the views of these parties were treated in your determination of industry
support)
-
INJURY ALLEGATION:
-
We have received a copy of the action request from the Director of the Office of
Investigations, International Trade Commission. It indicates that the ITC finds that the
petition contains adequate and accurate information with respect to material injury. (The
relevant injury data can be found on page (insert #) of the petition.)
-
Does the petition contain evidence of causation? (answer Yes or No) (See page (insert #)
of the petition.) Specifically, does the petition contain information relative to:
-
___ volume and value of imports (see page (insert #) of the petition)
-
___ U.S. market share (i.e., the ratio of imports to consumption) (see page (insert #)
of the petition)
-
___ actual pricing (i.e., evidence of decreased pricing) (see page (insert #) of the
petition)
-
___ relative pricing (i.e., evidence of imports underselling U.S. products) (see page
(insert #) of the petition)
-
PETITION REQUIREMENTS:
-
Does the petition contain the following:
the name and address of the petitioner
the names and addresses of all known domestic producers of the domestic like
product
the volume and value of the domestic like product produced by the petitioner
and each domestic producer identified for the most recently completed 12-month period for which data is available
-
Was the entire domestic industry identified in the petition?
Yes
No (% of producers identified)
-
Does the petition also contain the following:
a clear and detailed description of the merchandise to be investigated, including
the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers.
the name of each country in which the merchandise originates or from which
the merchandise is exported.
Was the petition filed simultaneously with the Department of Commerce and
the ITC?
Yes
No
an adequate summary of the proprietary data was provided.
a statement regarding release under administrative protective order.
a certification of the facts contained in the petition by an official of the
petitioning firm(s) and its legal representative (if applicable).
import volume and value information for the most recent two-year period.
-
LESS THAN FAIR VALUE ALLEGATION:
-
Export Price/Constructed Export Price
-
Provide an explanation on how the export price and/or constructed export price was
derived (include in your description the source of the pricing information and any
adjustments necessary to calculate an ex-factory price; reference the pages in the petition
that contain this information; if the information is based on a market research report or
affidavit, explain why you believe that these sources are appropriate).
-
Does the petition contain the following:
support documentation for the alleged prices or costs and claimed adjustments.
any market research reports including an affidavits referring to sources and
how information was obtained
current and dated price data (no more than one-year old).
price and cost data from contemporaneous time periods.
correct currency rates used for all conversions to U.S. dollars (i.e., Federal
Reserve Bank of New York).
conversion factors for comparisons of differing units of measure.
-
Normal value
-
Provide an explanation on how the export price was derived (include in your description
the source of the pricing information and any adjustments necessary to calculate an ex-factory price; reference the pages in the pe
tition that contain this information; if the
information is based on a market research report or affidavit, explain why you believe that
these sources are appropriate).
-
Does the petition contain the following:
support documentation for the alleged prices or costs and claimed adjustments.
any market research reports including an affidavits referring to sources and
how information was obtained.
current and dated price data (no more than one year old).
price and cost data from contemporaneous time periods.
correct currency rates used for all conversions to U.S. dollars (i.e., Federal
Reserve Bank of New York).
conversion factors for comparisons of differing units of measure.
-
ESTIMATED MARGINS:
(insert the range of estimated dumping margins)
-
OTHER ISSUES:
(e.g., COP allegation, regional industry, critical circumstances)
-
RECOMMENDATION:
-
Based on sources readily available to the Department, we have examined the accuracy
and adequacy of the evidence provided in the petition, and recommend determining that
the evidence is sufficient to justify the initiation of an antidumping investigation. We
also recommend determining that the petition has been filed by or on behalf of the
domestic industry.
-
반덤핑조사개시 체크리스트
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
제목 : (사건명 기입)
사건 번호 : (사건번호 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
제소자 :
(이름 기입 - 본사 및 공장의 위치 기입)
-
고문변호사 :
(법률회사 이름 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(피제소자)
(이름 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
범위 :
(조사범위 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
수입통계 : (최근 1년의 수입량과 수입액 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------
조사일정 :
신청일자
조사개시 최종일자
국제무역위원회의 예비판정
국제무역행정처의 예비판정
국제무역행정처의 최종판정
국제무역위원회의 최종판정
관세부과명령
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-
업계의 찬성 : 제소자는 국내동종물품 생산의 50% 이상을 점유하는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
아니오 ( % 기입)
-
만약 아니라면 찬성을 표하는 기업이 의견제시 기업중 다수이고 국내
생산의 최소한 25%를 점유하는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
아니오 - 조사개시 불가
-
어떻게 업계의 찬성이 이루어졌는지를 기술한다. - 특히 국내산업의
지지수준을 판단하기 위하여 수행된 여론조사나 기타 조치내용을 기술
한다.
-
신청에 반대가 있었는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
(반대를 표시한 각각의 관계인 명시)
아니오
-
신청에 반대한 자중 해외생산자와 연계된 수입업자나 국내생산자가 있는가?
예
아니오
(이들 당사자의 의견이 업계의 찬성여부를 판단할 때에 어떻게 반영되었
는지 설명한다)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
피해주장 :
국제무역위원회 조사국장으로부터 조치요청서 사본을 받는데, 이는 국제
무역위원회가 신청서에서 실질적인 피해와 관련하여 적절하고 정확한 자
료가 포함되어 있다는 것을 발견하였다는 것을 표시하는 것이다.
(관련되는 피해자료는 신청서의 해당페이지(페이지 수 기입)에서 볼 수
있다)
신청서에 인과관계의 근거가 포함되어 있는가?(예 또는 아니오 대답)
(신청서의 해당페이지 참조), 특히 다음과 관련한 자료를 포함하고 있는가?
수입량 및 수입금액
미국내 시장 점유율 (즉 소비에 대한 수입의 비율)
실제가격 (즉 가격인하의 증거)
상대가격 (미국상품의 판매를 위축시킨 수입의 증거)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
신청서의 구비사항
-
신청서에는 다음사항을 포함하고 있는가 :


검색결과는 7 건이고 총 280 라인의 자료가 출력되었습니다.    맨위로
(화면 어디서나 Alt+Z : 단어 재입력.)
(내용 중 검색하고 싶은 단어가 있으면 그 단어를 더블클릭하세요.)