고문변호사
다른 곳에서 찾기
네이버사전 다음사전
고문변호사 1인당 월정액 수당은 30만원이며 지난해 시 고문변호사 8명의 월정액과 수당은 모두 5,230만원이 지급됐다.
The monthly allowance per advisory attorney is KRW 300,000, and last year's eight advisory attorneys were paid KRW 52.3 million.
Companies big and small, from high tech to retail, have made John Doe
one of the most sued men in America.
존 도우(John Doe )씨는 대기업이나 중소기업, 하이테크기업, 소매업을
가리지않고 미국에서 기업들로부터 가장 많이 제소당한 인물이 됐다. 기업을
비방하는 글을 인터넷에 올린 혐의였다.
In yet another phenomenon of the Internet age, corporate executives have
been loosing their lawyers on the nation's courthouses to hunt down the
anonymous authors of disparaging -- or economically damaging -- content
getting posted these days on the Web.
기업들이 온라인에서 자기 기업을 비방한 익명의 네티즌들을 상대로 다반사로
소송을 제기하는 일이 인터넷 시대의 또다른 특징이 되고 있다. 웹사이트에
특정기업을 비난하거나 실제 경제적 손실을 주기위해 콘텐트를 올리는 사람들
을 찾아내 혼내주려고 기업들은 고문변호사들을 대거 동원해 법적 대응을 마
다하지 않고 있다.
``The deck is stacked entirely in favor of the companies filing these
cases,'' said David Sobel, general counsel for the Electronic Privacy
Information Center. ``It seems to me a real abuse of the judicial
system.''
전자프라이버시정보센터 데이빗 소벨(David Sobel) 고문변호사는 "소송은 전
적으로 소송을 제기한 기업들에 유리하게 돼 있다"며 "이는 진정 사법제도의
남용이다"고 꼬집었다.
Jon Sobel, Yahoo's associate general counsel, said the company is trying
to strike a balance between companies with legitimate concerns about
damaging postings and the free speech rights of members. But the company
policy is to release the information when it is subpoenaed.
야후의 존 소벨(Jon Sobel) 고문변호사는 이에 대해 야후는 비방 광고를
우려하는 기업들과 회원들의 언론 자유사이에서 균형을 유지하기위해 노력하고
있다고 밝혔다. 그렇지만 특정인이 조사대상이 되면 그 사실을 공표하는 것이
회사 방침이라고 덧붙였다.
ANTIDUMPING INVESTIGATIONS INITIATION CHECKLIST
-
SUBJECT: (insert case name)
-
CASE NUMBER: (insert case number)
-
PETITIONER(S):
(insert name(s) - provide the locations of each plant and headquarters)
-
COUNSEL:
(insert name of law firm)
-
RESPONDENT(S):
(insert name(s))
-
SCOPE:
(insert the scope of the investigation)
-
IMPORT STATISTICS:
(insert the volume and value of imports for the most recently completed calendar year,
year-to-date, and the corresponding prior period)
-
CASE CALENDAR:
Petition Filed:
Initiation Deadline:
ITC Preliminary Determination:
ITA Preliminary Determination:
ITA Final Determination:
ITC Final Determination:
Order:
-
INDUSTRY SUPPORT: Does the petitioner(s) account for more than 50% of production
of the domestic like product?
Yes (insert %) (petition page reference)
No (insert %)
-
If No, do those expressing support account for the majority of those expressing an
opinion and at least 25% of domestic production?
Yes
No - do not initiate
-
Describe how industry support was established - specifically, describe the nature of any
polling or other step undertaken to determine the level of domestic industry support.
-
Was there opposition to the petition?
Yes
(identify each party expressing opposition)
No
-
Are any of the parties who have expressed opposition to the petition either importers or
domestic producers affiliated with foreign producers?
Yes
No
(explain how the views of these parties were treated in your determination of industry
support)
-
INJURY ALLEGATION:
-
We have received a copy of the action request from the Director of the Office of
Investigations, International Trade Commission. It indicates that the ITC finds that the
petition contains adequate and accurate information with respect to material injury. (The
relevant injury data can be found on page (insert #) of the petition.)
-
Does the petition contain evidence of causation? (answer Yes or No) (See page (insert #)
of the petition.) Specifically, does the petition contain information relative to:
-
___ volume and value of imports (see page (insert #) of the petition)
-
___ U.S. market share (i.e., the ratio of imports to consumption) (see page (insert #)
of the petition)
-
___ actual pricing (i.e., evidence of decreased pricing) (see page (insert #) of the
petition)
-
___ relative pricing (i.e., evidence of imports underselling U.S. products) (see page
(insert #) of the petition)
-
PETITION REQUIREMENTS:
-
Does the petition contain the following:
the name and address of the petitioner
the names and addresses of all known domestic producers of the domestic like
product
the volume and value of the domestic like product produced by the petitioner
and each domestic producer identified for the most recently completed 12-month period for which data is available
-
Was the entire domestic industry identified in the petition?
Yes
No (% of producers identified)
-
Does the petition also contain the following:
a clear and detailed description of the merchandise to be investigated, including
the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers.
the name of each country in which the merchandise originates or from which
the merchandise is exported.
Was the petition filed simultaneously with the Department of Commerce and
the ITC?
Yes
No
an adequate summary of the proprietary data was provided.
a statement regarding release under administrative protective order.
a certification of the facts contained in the petition by an official of the
petitioning firm(s) and its legal representative (if applicable).
import volume and value information for the most recent two-year period.
-
LESS THAN FAIR VALUE ALLEGATION:
-
Export Price/Constructed Export Price
-
Provide an explanation on how the export price and/or constructed export price was
derived (include in your description the source of the pricing information and any
adjustments necessary to calculate an ex-factory price; reference the pages in the petition
that contain this information; if the information is based on a market research report or
affidavit, explain why you believe that these sources are appropriate).
-
Does the petition contain the following:
support documentation for the alleged prices or costs and claimed adjustments.
any market research reports including an affidavits referring to sources and
how information was obtained
current and dated price data (no more than one-year old).
price and cost data from contemporaneous time periods.
correct currency rates used for all conversions to U.S. dollars (i.e., Federal
Reserve Bank of New York).
conversion factors for comparisons of differing units of measure.
-
Normal value
-
Provide an explanation on how the export price was derived (include in your description
the source of the pricing information and any adjustments necessary to calculate an ex-factory price; reference the pages in the pe
tition that contain this information; if the
information is based on a market research report or affidavit, explain why you believe that
these sources are appropriate).
-
Does the petition contain the following:
support documentation for the alleged prices or costs and claimed adjustments.
any market research reports including an affidavits referring to sources and
how information was obtained.
current and dated price data (no more than one year old).
price and cost data from contemporaneous time periods.
correct currency rates used for all conversions to U.S. dollars (i.e., Federal
Reserve Bank of New York).
conversion factors for comparisons of differing units of measure.
-
ESTIMATED MARGINS:
(insert the range of estimated dumping margins)
-
OTHER ISSUES:
(e.g., COP allegation, regional industry, critical circumstances)
-
RECOMMENDATION:
-
Based on sources readily available to the Department, we have examined the accuracy
and adequacy of the evidence provided in the petition, and recommend determining that
the evidence is sufficient to justify the initiation of an antidumping investigation. We
also recommend determining that the petition has been filed by or on behalf of the
domestic industry.
-
반덤핑조사개시 체크리스트
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
제목 : (사건명 기입)
사건 번호 : (사건번호 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
제소자 :
(이름 기입 - 본사 및 공장의 위치 기입)
-
고문변호사 :
(법률회사 이름 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(피제소자)
(이름 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
범위 :
(조사범위 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
수입통계 : (최근 1년의 수입량과 수입액 기입)
-------------------------------------------------------------
조사일정 :
신청일자
조사개시 최종일자
국제무역위원회의 예비판정
국제무역행정처의 예비판정
국제무역행정처의 최종판정
국제무역위원회의 최종판정
관세부과명령
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-
업계의 찬성 : 제소자는 국내동종물품 생산의 50% 이상을 점유하는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
아니오 ( % 기입)
-
만약 아니라면 찬성을 표하는 기업이 의견제시 기업중 다수이고 국내
생산의 최소한 25%를 점유하는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
아니오 - 조사개시 불가
-
어떻게 업계의 찬성이 이루어졌는지를 기술한다. - 특히 국내산업의
지지수준을 판단하기 위하여 수행된 여론조사나 기타 조치내용을 기술
한다.
-
신청에 반대가 있었는가?
예 ( % 기입) (신청페이지 참고)
(반대를 표시한 각각의 관계인 명시)
아니오
-
신청에 반대한 자중 해외생산자와 연계된 수입업자나 국내생산자가 있는가?
예
아니오
(이들 당사자의 의견이 업계의 찬성여부를 판단할 때에 어떻게 반영되었
는지 설명한다)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
피해주장 :
국제무역위원회 조사국장으로부터 조치요청서 사본을 받는데, 이는 국제
무역위원회가 신청서에서 실질적인 피해와 관련하여 적절하고 정확한 자
료가 포함되어 있다는 것을 발견하였다는 것을 표시하는 것이다.
(관련되는 피해자료는 신청서의 해당페이지(페이지 수 기입)에서 볼 수
있다)
신청서에 인과관계의 근거가 포함되어 있는가?(예 또는 아니오 대답)
(신청서의 해당페이지 참조), 특히 다음과 관련한 자료를 포함하고 있는가?
수입량 및 수입금액
미국내 시장 점유율 (즉 소비에 대한 수입의 비율)
실제가격 (즉 가격인하의 증거)
상대가격 (미국상품의 판매를 위축시킨 수입의 증거)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
신청서의 구비사항
-
신청서에는 다음사항을 포함하고 있는가 :
검색결과는 5 건이고 총 258 라인의 자료가 출력되었습니다. 맨위로
(화면 어디서나 Alt+Z : 단어 재입력.)
(내용 중 검색하고 싶은 단어가 있으면 그 단어를 더블클릭하세요.)
